AI AUTOMATION AGENCY

AI Automation Systems, Engineered and Run for You

The capability of an automation agency, delivered by one senior engineer — content pipelines, AI agents and edge infrastructure that ship, and keep running, with direct accountability.

Free introductory call.
A $1,500 diagnostic, credited toward a fixed-price build.

EXAMPLE: A CAMPAIGN WORKFLOW
01

Understand the brief

Use the brand’s inputs and relevant research.

02

Prepare the content

Draft the copy and produce the visual assets.

03

Get approval

Send images for review and use the feedback for revisions.

04

Schedule approved assets

Hand the accepted campaign to the publishing tool.

BASED ON THE CAMPAIGN CASE STUDY
Work directly with HeshamAn agreed scope and fixed priceCode and infrastructure you own

START WITH THE TASK

Where automation helps.

The useful question is which part of your process needs flexible judgement, and how you will know the result is acceptable.

RESEARCH & CONTENT

Turn a brief into a reviewable draft.

Retrieve relevant material, structure a response and prepare it for your publishing process.

  • Source retrieval and reference handling
  • Brand and output-format requirements
  • Editorial approval and exception handling

DOCUMENT OPERATIONS

Turn incoming documents into useful records.

Extract fields, classify documents and route the result into the tools your team already uses.

  • Defined schemas and validation
  • Ambiguous or incomplete records sent for review
  • A traceable link to the original document

CHOOSE THE RIGHT APPROACH

Where automation won’t help.

Good automation starts by ruling out the wrong tool. Some work needs the flexible judgement of an AI agent; plenty is safer as deterministic code; and a little shouldn’t be automated yet at all.

The result must be exact

Totals, eligibility rules and other defined calculations need reproducible logic. A language model shouldn’t be the authority for a number you have to stand behind.

Better fit: SQL, typed code or a rules-based n8n workflow, with validation and exceptions routed for review.

The steps are already known

When the sequence never changes, there’s nothing for a model to decide — and a deterministic workflow is cheaper to run and easier to trust.

Better fit: A scheduled or event-driven n8n workflow with explicit branches, retries and proper error handling.

The data isn’t there yet

No system can invent facts the business doesn’t hold, or resolve who owns a record when that was never decided.

Better fit: Fix the source data and add a proper data layer and validation before any decision is automated.

The action needs authorisation

A consequential action shouldn’t fire just because a model — or a workflow — proposes it.

Better fit: Authenticated approval steps and constrained actions, with the system preparing the recommendation for a person to release.

Success isn’t defined yet

If the team can’t describe an acceptable result, there’s no sound basis for evaluating what gets built.

Better fit: Run a manual pilot first — gather representative examples and agree acceptance criteria, then automate.

The task is too occasional

Low-volume work can cost less to handle by hand than to build and maintain a system around.

Better fit: A checklist, template or small utility now — revisit automation when the repeated work justifies it.

A SYSTEM YOU CAN INSPECT

From a brand brief to a scheduled campaign.

This n8n case study connects research, platform-specific copy, generated images and scheduling. Images go to Slack for approval; rejected images are revised using the reviewer’s feedback. It shows where a person participates in a concrete workflow.

Read the full case study
63-NODE CAMPAIGN ENGINE
01

Input

A brand brief and the campaign requirements.

02

Work

Research, platform-specific drafts and images.

03

Review

Image approval and feedback in Slack.

04

Output

Approved assets stored and scheduled through Late.

THE APPROVAL POINT IS VISIBLE IN THE DESIGN

BEFORE IT GOES LIVE

Agree what a good result looks like.

Every system we ship needs acceptance criteria, failure examples and an operating plan — not just working code.

EVALUATION

Test the cases that matter.

Use representative inputs, known answers where available, and examples of incomplete or misleading inputs.

  • Assess the result against task-specific criteria
  • Check the integrations and permissions each step relies on
  • Measure response time and cost on the sample workload

HANDOVER

Make uncertainty visible.

Give the team a way to inspect decisions, review exceptions and adjust the workflow.

  • Approval points for consequential actions
  • A fallback for when a service or model fails
  • Versioned changes and a route to re-evaluate them

WORKING TOGETHER

Define the job before building the automation.

The free call is an introduction. The diagnostic is the paid engagement that defines the build.

01 / DIAGNOSTIC

Find the right first build.

Identify the task, tools, data access and approval points. Agree the evaluation cases and a fixed-price implementation scope.

$1,500Credited toward the build

03 / ONGOING SUPPORT

Keep a named person involved.

Optional monitoring, fixes and improvements from the person who built the system. The support scope is agreed separately.

Scoped to your systemOptional after launch

GO DEEPER

Read the patterns behind the automation.

Explore the Claude workbook, or examine a document-processing workflow that extracts financial records and makes them queryable.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Straight answers on cost, ownership and what happens after launch.

What does a project cost?
Who actually does the work?
What happens after launch?
How fast can we start?
Do you build on n8n specifically?
Can you migrate us from Zapier or Make?
Cloud n8n or self-hosted?
When does a build need Cloudflare instead of n8n?
Do I own what you build?
Where are you based?
Are you insured, and will you sign an NDA?
How can I check your credentials without marketplace reviews?

Which task is taking more judgement than it should?

Bring a representative input and an example of the output your team needs.